Profit-sharing plans: Company owes back wages for ignoring the rules Keys to Making sure programs hold up to federal scrutiny Profit-sharing plans are an excellent way to keep employees invested in a company’s success. But compliance issues can be costly for employers. One Indiana lawn care company learned this firsthand. Precision Cut Lawn Service gave employees flat salaries with no overtime pay. The company said this practice was part of its profit-sharing plan, where employees received individual bonuses depending on the business’s revenue during certain time periods. But the Dept. of Labor (DOL) didn’t buy it. The agency ordered Precision Cut Lawn Service to pay $31,905 in back wages to 50 employees. How it qualifies The terms of a profit-sharing plan can’t keep workers from receiving pay for hours they’ve already worked. Only bona fide profit-sharing plans will hold up under DOL scrutiny. A plan is considered bona fide if: It’s in writing It’s funded solely by profits from the employer’s business, and It clearly communicates participation requirements to employees. Payments need to be made to the fund periodically. They amount paid must be determined by a formula that can be based on factors such as worker’s straight-time earnings, base rate of pay, length of service and total earnings. The formula should be clearly stated in the plan documents. Note: As long as these requirements are met, employers are allowed to exclude any profit-sharing payments from the regular rate of pay. More info: bit.ly/law562
Profit-sharing plans:
Recent Posts
- How Payroll Can Help with Employee Retention
- Earnings thresholds for the Executive, Administrative, and Professional exemption from minimum wage and overtime protections under the FLSA
- Prevailing wage violations
- Year-End Payroll Checklist for Businesses
- Payroll Mistakes That Could Be Costing Your Company Money
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
Categories
- 2017 Tax Changes
- 2018 tax changes
- 2019 tax changes
- 2021 Tax Changes
- 2022 Tax Changes
- business expenses
- Checking Email
- compensation
- Covid-19
- deductions
- Department of Labor, labor regulations
- direct deposit
- EEO-1 Regs
- employee benefits
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- FFCRA
- FMLA
- Form I-9
- Garnishments
- Hacking
- hiring
- Identity Theft
- Independent Contractor
- New hire
- Overtime
- Recordkeeping
- reimbursement
- Remote work
- retirement plan limits 2020
- Scammers
- Social Security Limits
- tax rates
- taxes
- Timekeeping
- Uncategorized
- unemployment
- W-2s
- W-4s
- W2 Requirements
Recent Comments