Company ‘banked’ hours to pay at later date, now owes $104K in OT Paid workers for additional time at their regular rates Sometimes, if work comes in waves, a company may want to help workers out by allowing them to “bank” extra hours in a workweek, applying them to a future pay period when work is sparse. While this may seem like a nice gesture to keep workers’ paychecks from being short, it also runs afoul of labor laws. While this may seem like a nice gesture to keep workers’ paychecks from being short, it also runs afoul of labor laws. One California employer with this policy now owes back wages to several employees after the Dept. of Labor investigated its pay practices. Pacific Custom Pools Inc. would hold employees’ hours if they worked more than 40 hours in a workweek. Then, the company would pay workers the hours at straight-time rates during later weeks when they either worked fewer than 40 hours or requested the pay for their banked hours in a lump sum. Because workers weren’t given the overtime pay they should’ve received, Pacific Custom Pools must now pay $104,739 to 13 employees. Handling Comp time Under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, banking excess hours worked for nonexempt employees as comp time or paying them as the regular rate on future paychecks isn’t allowed. They must always be paid one-and-a-half times their regular rate for any hours worked over 40 in a workweek. In certain sectors, such as in state and local government, employees may be eligible to earn comp time, as long as it’s agreed upon in advance. More info: bit.ly/bank567
Company ‘banked’ hours to pay at later date, now owes $104K in OT
Recent Posts
- How Payroll Can Help with Employee Retention
- Earnings thresholds for the Executive, Administrative, and Professional exemption from minimum wage and overtime protections under the FLSA
- Prevailing wage violations
- Year-End Payroll Checklist for Businesses
- Payroll Mistakes That Could Be Costing Your Company Money
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
Categories
- 2017 Tax Changes
- 2018 tax changes
- 2019 tax changes
- 2021 Tax Changes
- 2022 Tax Changes
- business expenses
- Checking Email
- compensation
- Covid-19
- deductions
- Department of Labor, labor regulations
- direct deposit
- EEO-1 Regs
- employee benefits
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- FFCRA
- FMLA
- Form I-9
- Garnishments
- Hacking
- hiring
- Identity Theft
- Independent Contractor
- New hire
- Overtime
- Recordkeeping
- reimbursement
- Remote work
- retirement plan limits 2020
- Scammers
- Social Security Limits
- tax rates
- taxes
- Timekeeping
- Uncategorized
- unemployment
- W-2s
- W-4s
- W2 Requirements
Recent Comments